|
Post by BeerGeek on Jan 11, 2012 16:14:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JoshiQ on Jan 11, 2012 16:22:32 GMT -5
It's amazing to me how guys back then had much broader chests. They seemed to focus on that a lot more than now where guys mostly focus on bigger arms and shoulders.
Anyways, I'd go with bulky. He isn't quite defined enough to be muscular, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by snabbit888 on Jan 11, 2012 16:53:38 GMT -5
Yeah, bulky.
|
|
|
Post by LillaThrilla on Jan 13, 2012 15:23:16 GMT -5
Definitely bulkly. If you're sure if the guy is muscular, he probably isn't. I'm pretty sure muscular is just for really jacked guys with massive biceps, 6-pack abs, and/or no neck (ex: Brock Lesnar, Hulk Hogan)
|
|